A few years ago, in an article in the Grants Pass Daily Courier about my problem with the
litter and weed problems in this city, our then-City-Manager Laurel Samson
said, “We enforce our nuisance codes by peer pressure.” Trouble was then and still is that almost no
peers are willing to apply it. Like any
necessary evil, it doesn’t necessarily win one friends, and it can be dangerous
when one tries to correct a disorderly person.
This is why we have police, public nags, to do dangerous jobs like
telling someone that one’s property is disorderly and one needs to clean it up.
But our city police presently are forbidden to enforce or even
notice property maintenance and other city codes, the better to enforce state
laws, one supposes, though our City Charter demands that the Manager enforce
all city codes and does not mention state laws.
Our previous manager, David Frasher, in 2006 set up a Code Enforcement
Department of non-sworn officers, soon renamed as “Community Service Officers,”
(CSOs) supposedly to enforce city codes, but actually to be the place where
property nuisance complaints go to die, while complaints about other code
violations like lack of sign permits and fees are enforced.
When nuisances ripen into safety hazards, CSOs eventually cite and
abate the hazard. But even hazards are
not enforced against until they become a big enough hassle to clean up that the
responsible party might let the city to do it for profit. They used to charge a 10% of cost
administration fee for hazard abatements; it recently was raised to 20%. After all, people will clean up a minor
nuisance or safety hazard with only a warning from a cop, which makes no money
for the city.
But the purpose of nuisance codes is to stop safety hazards from
developing. When police won’t do their
job of necessary nagging, the responsibility for it falls on private people,
“peer pressure,” as Ms. Samson said.
This Litter Cleaner has been applying a subtle kind of peer pressure for
the last year, demonstrating cleaning of litter on private and public
properties. It has been too subtle, and
subtlety doesn’t work for a protest.
It’s time to make it blatant, by picketing one property at a time,
starting with the most egregious offender, a restaurant that piles empty boxes
out front of their store under their overhang, an obvious safety problem. Let’s see how long it takes them to clean up
their exterior with a protester holding a sign for a couple of hours per week
and handing out leaflets.
(It took about a half-hour, and was not pleasant for anyone involved. The next target is Walmart, which is the
biggest offender, will be tougher, and won’t take it so personally.)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think that next week I'll picket Walmart. They have long deserved it, and they should be a real challenge. As it is, they are a big, bad influence on the businesses around them.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete